{"id":851,"date":"2022-11-07T11:17:17","date_gmt":"2022-11-07T10:17:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bretterhofer.at\/blog\/?page_id=851"},"modified":"2022-11-07T12:25:25","modified_gmt":"2022-11-07T11:25:25","slug":"collecting-microsoft-issues-with-ipv6-only","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/bretterhofer.at\/blog\/collecting-microsoft-issues-with-ipv6-only\/","title":{"rendered":"Collecting Microsoft Issues with IPV6 only"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the road to IPv6 Only for enterprises there is always some hint from the Network providers that enterprises lack progress.<\/p>\n<p>So we need to collect Issues and find solutions.<\/p>\n<h2>Microsoft Services lacking IPv6 support<\/h2>\n<p><a name=\"#missingAAA_visualstudio\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h3>Visual Studio: All those services have no AAAA records<\/h3>\n<pre>nslookup -type=a dc.services.visualstudio.com\r\n\r\nName: weu016-breeziest-in.cloudapp.net\r\nAddress: 13.69.106.89\r\nAliases: dc.services.visualstudio.com\r\ndc.applicationinsights.microsoft.com\r\ndc.applicationinsights.azure.com\r\nglobal.in.ai.monitor.azure.com\r\nglobal.in.ai.privatelink.monitor.azure.com\r\ndc.trafficmanager.net\r\n\r\n<\/pre>\n<p>See https:\/\/github.com\/microsoft\/ApplicationInsights-dotnet\/issues\/2619<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"#missingAAA_github\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h3>Github.com<\/h3>\n<p>Some progress on Ipv6 but no get checkout with IPv6 yet.<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/github.com\/community\/community\/discussions\/10539<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/github.blog\/changelog\/2021-09-30-enabling-ipv6-support-for-github-pages\/<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"#missingAAA_cmg\"><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"cloud-management-gateway\" class=\"heading-anchor\">Cloud management gateway<\/h3>\n<p>The cloud management gateway provides management of internet-based clients. It uses a combination of a Microsoft Azure cloud service, and an on-premises site system role that communicates with that service. Internet-based clients use the cloud service to communicate with the on-premises Configuration Manager.<\/p>\n<p>But the Requirements state: Clients must use <strong>IPv4<\/strong>. There is support for Dualstack Loadbalancer in Front of <strong>virtual machine scale set<\/strong>s. But a there seem other needed Feature needed to get it working. Question to Audience: Whats is missing?<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/learn.microsoft.com\/en-us\/mem\/configmgr\/core\/clients\/manage\/cmg\/plan-cloud-management-gateway#requirements<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On the road to IPv6 Only for enterprises there is always some hint from the Network providers that enterprises lack progress. So we need to<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bretterhofer.at\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/851"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bretterhofer.at\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bretterhofer.at\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bretterhofer.at\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bretterhofer.at\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=851"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/bretterhofer.at\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/851\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":855,"href":"https:\/\/bretterhofer.at\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/851\/revisions\/855"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bretterhofer.at\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=851"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}